Thanks for your letter in response to our previous submission of our manuscript (ABAB-3437). After having carefully read your letter, I feel little bit confused as your decision. The two reviewers and you previously suggested that our manuscript (ABAB-3437) could be accepted for publication should we be prepared to incorporate minor revisions. We had revised our manuscript carefully and complemented some experiments raised by the reviewers. The rejected decision of the Editorial Board might be because that we did not answer some of the reviewers’ comments clearly. We carefully considered the reviewers’ comments again and have further modified the manuscript according to your letters. In addition, we have consulted a professional language editing services to check the English.
We believe our manuscript (ABAB-3437) is potentially publishable for the following reasons.
First, this work presents interesting results on XXXXXXXXXX(省略……)
We understand that the misunderstanding might be caused by the unclear description in our manuscript, but we believe that the results are of merit and the paper is potentially publishable in the journal. Therefore, we would be most grateful if you could re-consider our work and give us a second opportunity. Thank you very much for your patience and understanding. Looking forward to hearing from you,
With best regards,
xxx and xxx
Dear Dr. or Prof. XXXX,
Thank you for your efficient work in processing our manuscript entitled “XXXX (文章題目)” (文章編號).
After we have carefully read the comments from the reviewers, we realize that the majormerits of our work were not fully identified or recognized by the reviewers.Here we would emphasize that the most notable merits of our manuscript include：接著說你論文的優點. However,the some of the comments have limitations: 接著說下你覺得哪些審稿意見有問題。
I will be most grateful if you could offer us a second opportunity (or an additional opportunity if the rejected manuscript is already a revised one).Look for ward to hearing from you soon.
Thank you for your kind attention to consider our manuscript. We have not the slightest grudge against the rejection. However,the reviewer’s report is quite unconvincing and unfair, or, if we may say,somewhat irresponsible for our work. So, we have to give a rebuttal against the comments of the first and the only reviewer by accommodating the reviewer’s comments.
In short, we could not accept the comments given by the reviewer #1, and we would be very grateful if the editor can justify our rebuttals and reconsider our manuscript.
Thank you very much for your patience and understanding.
Thanks for your email. I am sorry to learn that our manuscript was rejected based on the comments “XXXX” (被拒稿的原因), however, XXXX(寫反駁理由). As such, I would like to ask if you could send it to a third referee for a review and then reconsider your decision? Thank you very much for your help!
I am looking forward to hearing from you.
職稱驛站 www.emorreramfelizesparasempre.com 版權所有 仿冒必究 冀ICP備16002873號-3